![]() The experts who were part of the shroud team, most notably Barry Shwortz are outspoken in their belief that this is a genuine man who was savagely beaten and crucified and died some 2,000 years ago. The biggest reason for this is because of the flawed carbon dating techniques that were used. The science behind the shroud is jaw-dropping, yet most people still consider it to be a fake! ![]() It was proven to not be a counterfeit or a masterful work of art as some skeptics like to say. The picture on the cloth displays an extremely brutalized and crucified man with puncture wounds, blood stains and a crown of thorns, which are consistent with the gospels of the bible. The Shroud of Turin seems to show a combination of the properties of an X-ray image, a 3D holographic image, and a negative image used in photography. “In archaeology, if there are ten lines of evidence, carbon dating being one of them, and it conflicts with the other nine, there is little hesitation to throw out the carbon date as inaccurate due to unforeseen contamination.” Rather, it was an image left by a real man. The consensus among these experts is that it was not a fraudulent masterpiece by an artist or a group of paid conspirators during the medieval period. Air Force Weapons Laboratories, Brooks Institute of Photography, Nuclear Technology Corporation, Sandia Laboratories, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and multiple universities. Over a period of 3 years and 150,000 man hours, the Shroud of Turin was examined by many doctors, scientists, medical examiners, and other experts from places such as Los Alamos National Scientific Laboratories, U.S. The hardest part I found was the dispelling of scientific agendas, pride in regards to disproven studies, and dishonesty in keeping with false narratives. The more I looked into this subject the more clearly I began to see the truth of the matter, even though nothing has been proven in regards to definitive evidence. The cognitive dissonance began to disappear but I still had questions. What he revealed about the shroud was astonishing. This particular guest was one of the few distinguished experts who belonged to the scientific team (STURP) who were given the privilege to examine the shroud in 1978 in Turin, Italy. How can anyone argue with that? But a few years ago I was listening to a podcast at work wherein the guest was discussing a series of pieces of evidence for the Shroud of Turin. As far as I was concerned the science was settled. ![]() There were television shows as well and investigative reports from the early 90’s that claimed the radiocarbon dating of the shroud was from between 1260-1390 AD which consequently meant it was a medieval forgery. It had a picture of the Shroud of Turin on the cover and the headline questioned if it was a medieval forgery. I vaguely remember seeing a National Geographic headline on the magazine rack in the checkout stand at the store when I was a kid. Please visit the wiki for the complete list.įor most of my life I was always under the impression that the Shroud of Turin was a fraudulent work of art made by the famous Leonardo da Vinci. No one comes to the Father except through me." - John 14:6Ĭome chat with us on IRC /#reddit-Christianity /#reddit-Christianity-meta Religious/Denominational Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. If you are asking a question, be sure to check our FAQ as it may have already been addressed there. Our Community Policy (XP for short) contains guidelines to help promote healthy discussion and discourage trolling, please review it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |